| COACHING CORNER
>
Varied paths of leadership
Written by: Renée LeMoine
Photo by: V&V
"After completing a leadership
assessment, I became aware of my preferred leadership style, and
found it to be rather useful information for improving communication
between my staff and me. Is there any research showing that certain
types of leadership styles are more effective, or more preferred
by employees?
 |
 |
There are many factors that can influence an employee's preference
for a specific leadership style, such as the quality of the leader-employee
relation, group norms, the organization's culture, team expectations,
and how much power you have over employees. Therefore, it is best
to avoid the temptation of seeking out a leadership style that will
work for you in all situations.
While there are many labels for the various leadership styles, the
two most frequently used are directive and supportive. A supportive
leader shows concern for the needs of the employees, whereas the
directive leader lets employees know what is expected of them. Depending
on the characteristic of the employee (such as his/her experience
or ability), and contextual factors in the workplace (such as degree
of team support) you can modify your leadership style to meet most
employees' needs.
If you have an employee who lacks certain skills or experience you
would err in using the supportive leadership style. An inexperienced
employee needs specific guidance and direction. When tasks are ambiguous
or confusing, direction is always needed. Similarly, if there is
a lot of conflict within the work group, or a crisis at hand, a
directive leadership style should be applied generously. In this
case, your job is to lessen the conflict and make it easier for
them to do their jobs effectively.
Conversely, employees who have lots of experience, strong skills,
and/or well-structured tasks will appreciate a supportive leadership
style. Keep in mind that your job as a leader is to compensate for
the things lacking in your employee, or the work setting. Your effectiveness
as a leader will depend on how well you can identify factors that
are lacking, and your ability to fill in the gaps.
Article prepared by Renée LeMoine, Executive Director, LeMoine
& Associates
Based on R.J. House, "Path-Goal Theory of Leadership: Lessons,
Legacy and Reformulation," Leadership Quarterly, Fall 1996.
We welcome feedback and suggestions for
management topics which are of interest to you. Please submit your
questions or comments to: coachingcorner@prague-tribune.cz.
|